Legal Opinion

Access Capital, Inc. v. DeCicco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 2002PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rubin, J.

Appellant Frank DeCicco contends that invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination in response to each of the 110 allegations of the complaint precludes the award of summary judgment against him. Unlike a criminal prosecution, assertion of the privilege in civil proceedings does not relieve a defendant of the obligation to put in a defense. As appellant has failed to tender admissible evidence requiring trial of any issue of fact, summary judgment was properly entered against him.

The complaint asserts that plaintiff Access Capital, Inc.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. El-Dehdan v. El-DehdanNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. El-Dehdan v. El-DehdanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Searle v. Cayuga Medical Center at IthacaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Campbell v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. In re AstorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API