State v. Cobb
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentJenkins, J.
| íFinding that the majority’s opinion directly conflicts with this Court’s recent opinion in State v. Reyer, 13-0135 (La.App. 4 Cir. 11/20/13), 129 So.3d 752, I respectfully dissent.
Contrary to the majority’s opinion, I believe that the defendant has no obligation to prove when she is alleged to have committed a crime, or to file a bill of particulars to prove the alleged date. Rather, the law is well-settled that the defendant need only raise prescription as an issue; once raised, it is the State that has the burden of proving that the prosecution was timely initiated. Reyer, 13-0135, pp.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mathes v. SchwingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- State v. LoveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Palmetto Oil Co. v. Bethany Oil & Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- McLean v. HunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- State v. RomeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.