Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Cobb

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 2014No. 2013-KA-0431Published

1DissentJenkins, J.

| íFinding that the majority’s opinion directly conflicts with this Court’s recent opinion in State v. Reyer, 13-0135 (La.App. 4 Cir. 11/20/13), 129 So.3d 752, I respectfully dissent.

Contrary to the majority’s opinion, I believe that the defendant has no obligation to prove when she is alleged to have committed a crime, or to file a bill of particulars to prove the alleged date. Rather, the law is well-settled that the defendant need only raise prescription as an issue; once raised, it is the State that has the burden of proving that the prosecution was timely initiated. Reyer, 13-0135, pp.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mathes v. SchwingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. State v. LoveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  3. Palmetto Oil Co. v. Bethany Oil & Gas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. McLean v. HunterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  5. State v. RomeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API