Legal Opinion
Mathes v. Schwing
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 29, 1929No. 10,962PublishedCited by 581 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING.
JANVÍER, J.
The facts of this case are fully stated in the original opinion and it is unnecessary to repeat them here.
The rehearing was granted because we desired a fuller discussion of the question of the protection afforded by the traffic ordinance (to-wit, No. 7490 Commission Council Series) to a person not on the usual crossing, but emerging from behind a street car, and at a point forty or fifty feet nearer the center of the square than the usual pedestrian walk-way across the street.
In the original opinion it was held that portion of the ordinance (subsection (e) of article…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Day v. CunninghamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926
- Rice v. Crescent City RailroadSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
- Belle Alliance Co. v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Shally v. N O. Public Service & Sewerage & Water BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Shaw v. BoltonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by581 opinions
- State v. JacobsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- State v. LawsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- Shelter Mutual Insurance Company v. Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
- Pouncy v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. HortonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
576 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.