Legal Opinion

Amerson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 22, 1980No. LL-228PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Judge.

Amerson was convicted of conspiracy to sell cocaine after pleading no contest, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress the fruits of intercepted wire communications on the telephone of codefendant Eddie Mangun.

A trial judge authorized interception of wire communications at the Mangun residence based on the affidavit of Deputy Williams that he had first met, through a *1388confidential informant, Eddie, who at that time had discussed with him the sale of cocaine. Eddie told the deputy his supply was exhausted but more would be available in a few days. He…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. King v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  3. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  4. United States v. BaynesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Betancourt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Sarno v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. State v. EnriquezCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API