Legal Opinion
State v. Ross
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided September 4, 1984No. 11515; 11516; 11517; 11518PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The principal issue in these appeals is whether the trial court, Meehan, J., erred in concluding that there was no probable cause to support the state’s application for an order authorizing interception of certain telephonic communications under General Statutes § 54-41a et seq.
On May 1,1981, the state’s attorney for the judicial district of Waterbury submitted, under oath, an application to the state wiretap panel1 requesting permis*449sion to intercept the telephonic communications of certain named individuals, including the defendants, on telephone facility 263-4337 subscribed to by the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- State v. KimbroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. GrullonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. TomaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. RuscoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.