Legal Opinion
Eacret v. Bonner County
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 2004No. 28092, 29137PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURDICK, Justice.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Fred and Ron Harris (Harris) first applied to Bonner County for a variance from the setback requirements after they had begun construction of a boathouse on the shore of Lake Pend Oreille. In February 2000, the denial of the variance by the Planning and Zoning Commission became final, after the County Commissioners dismissed the appeal for failure to state lawful grounds upon which the appeal could be based. Bonner County Revised Code (BCRC) § 12-451(d)(l).
Harris filed a second application for a variance regarding the boathouse in August of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hortonville Joint School District No. 1 v. Hortonville Education Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stivers v. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Cooper v. Bd. of County Com'rs of Ada CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Payette River Property Owners Ass'n v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- City of Osburn v. RandelIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Cowan v. Board of Com'rs of Fremont CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Marcia T. Turner, L.L.C. v. City of Twin FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Crown Point Development, Inc. v. City of Sun ValleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Hawkins v. Bonneville County Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.