Legal Opinion

Schinmann v. United States

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided September 18, 1985No. C-82-064JLQ, C-82-093JLQPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

QUACKENBUSH, District Judge.

BEFORE THE COURT is the government’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Ct. Rec. 21), 1 which came on for hearing with oral argument as scheduled September 9, 1985. Plaintiffs were represented by Bryan G. Evenson and Burton J. Goldstein; Assistant United States Attorney Robert M. Sweeney appeared on behalf of the government.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

This is a case brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., by about 159 farmers and irrigation system users in the Yakima Valley of South Central…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. United States v. NeustadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mt. Homes, Inc., a Washington Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. Department of Ecology v. AcquavellaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. STATE, DEPT. OF ECOLOGY v. AcquavellaWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Ard v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
  5. Esquivel v. ZinkeDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API