Legal Opinion

Department of Ecology v. Acquavella

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1997No. 63401-7PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDollxver, J.

In a direct appeal, the Yakima-Tieton Irrigation District (YTID) challenges several aspects of the trial court’s ruling on YTID’s water right. The Department of Ecology and numerous other parties have cross-appealed.

This direct appeal arises from a general adjudication of water rights in the Yakima River Basin that began in *7501977. Other matters concerning the adjudication have been before this court two previous times. In the first appeal, this court allowed the general adjudication to proceed even though personal service of process had not been served on over 40,000 individual parties who…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ickes v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Kittitas Reclamation District United States of America v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Department of Ecology v. AcquavellaWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Jensen v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Department of Ecology v. GrimesWashington Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hillis v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Department of Ecology v. TheodoratusWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State, Dept. of Ecology v. TheodoratusWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API