Legal Opinion

Ard v. Federal Deposit Insurance

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 11, 2011No. Case CV 10-03767 MMM (AJWx)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.

On July 11, 2008, the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) closed IndyMac Bank and appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as the bank’s receiver pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1821(c)(2)(A). Plaintiffs Lesley Ard and Steven Ard, depositors with IndyMac who lost approximately $2,131,034.00 as a result of the bank’s closure, previously filed suit in this district against the FDIC as receiver, alleging wrongful acts by IndyMac (Case No. CV 09 — 4115). 1 Plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed as prudentially…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jill B. & Travis B. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. City of Lincoln v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
  3. Hawthorn Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
  4. Pauletta v. DiehlDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. S. David Sedaghat v. Jerry RolesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API