Legal Opinion
M.T. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 30, 2009No. A125704PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McGUINESS, P. J.
Petitioner M.T. is the presumed father of three children who have been in long-term foster care since 2004. At a postpermanency status review hearing, the juvenile court set the matter for a Welfare and Institutions Code 1 section 366.26 hearing to consider modifying the permanent plan for two of the children from long-term foster care to adoption. Petitioner seeks extraordinary writ review of the court’s order, asserting he was entitled to a hearing to contest the recommendation of the San Francisco Department of Human Services (Department) to refer the matter to a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- San Diego County Department of Social Services v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sonoma County Human Services Department v. J.H.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. G.F.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. R.G. (In re R.G.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Alaniz v. Sun Pacific ShippersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Alaniz v. Sun Pacific Shippers, L.P.California Court of Appeal · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.