Reed v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
1DissentBerdon, J.
I disagree with the majority. The statute governing subdivisions mandates that the defendant adopt regulations which “provide that the land to be subdivided shall be of such character that it can be used for building purposes without danger to health or the public safety . . . . ” General Statutes § 8-25. Section 3.2 of the Chester subdivision regulations specifically provides that the “proposed lots shall be of such . . . location . . . and character . . . that they can be occupied and used for building pur*160poses without danger to the health and safety of the occupants and the public.”1 It is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Forest Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Town of Westport v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Luf v. Town of SouthburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Town of Wethersfield v. National Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Stamford Dock & Realty Corp. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.