Legal Opinion
Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. Holz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, P. J.
This is an appeal from an order of the Supreme Court which denied and dismissed on the merits petitioner’s application for a review of a determination of the respondent Superintendent of Insurance denying a claim for a refund of $14,186 paid by it as so-called retaliatory taxes, pursuant to section 61 of the Insurance Law, for the years 1949, 1950, 1951 and 1952.
Petitioner, the Mutual Benefit Health and Accident Association (hereafter called Mutual) is a foreign insurance company, doing business in the State of New York, with its home office in the State of Nebraska. It is subject to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Ætna Insurance v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- In re the Estate of WeltonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In re the Estate of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company of Boston v. PinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nathel v. Commissioner of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. WrynnNew York Supreme Court · 2012