Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Kochovos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 5, 1988PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*181In this probate proceeding, the law firm of LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae, representing the contestants, served 15 separate judicial subpoenas duces tecum during the conduct of discovery without notifying the proponent. These subpoenas were served on various banks and on two doctors, all nonparties to the action, and commanded attendance at a deposition and production of certain records. At the later deposition of the proponent Penelope Danias, information that had been obtained through the service of these subpoenas was used by LeBoeuf, Lamb during the examination of the witness.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re BeinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. In re BeinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. In re the Estate of KochovosNew York Surrogate's Court · 1987

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DiMarco v. SparksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Surgical Design Corp. v. CorreaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Brussels Leasing Limited Partnership v. HenneNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Boltja v. Southside HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Greenfield v. LyonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API