Legal Opinion
Brussels Leasing Limited Partnership v. Henne
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 8, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David Goldstein, J.
*536These applications raise novel issues dealing with the propriety of an attorney’s use of a judicial subpoena duces tecum to secure production of documents from a nonparty witness, without any application made pursuant to CPLR 3120 (b) and without notice to all parties to the underlying proceeding.
These are two separate applications to compel respondent to comply with two separate judicial subpoenas duces tecum, which had been served upon her in connection with two Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) proceedings (DHCR docket Nos. KL-130030-B,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re BeinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re BeinyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Mestel & Co. v. Smythe Masterson & Judd, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- State v. MastracciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- In re the Estate of KochovosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wilson v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Cavalry SPV I, LLC v. Patrick Morrisey, Attorney General, etc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Nagel v. GraysonCivil Court of the City of New York · 2009
- Missionary Sisters, Inc. v. FauerbachAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016