Legal Opinion

White v. Nemastil

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1985No. 49040PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, P.J.

Both the buyers and the sellers appeal from a judgment granting the buyers damages for breach of their residential real estate sales contract. The buyers (Roy and Sadie White) claim that the court should have (a) ordered specific performance, (b) awarded greater damages against the sellers, and (c) granted them judgment against the broker, A.J. Lewis and Associates, Inc. The sellers (James and Caro Nemastil) claim that the court should have (a) denied the buyers any relief, and (b) granted them damages against the buyers and the broker.

We hold that the trial court had sufficient evidence to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mr. Mark Corp. v. Rush, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Bretz v. Union Central Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Green, Inc. v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Sternberg v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Scott v. CravaackOhio Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Desantis v. SollerOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Allen v. LeeOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Smargon v. Grand Lodge Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  4. Bychowski v. ERA Tempo Realty, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Lentz v. SchnippelOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API