Winnebago Cnty. v. J.M. (In Re Mental Commitment of J.M.)
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShirley S. Abrahamson, J.
*32¶ 1 This review involves a Chapter 51 commitment-extension proceeding. The unpublished decision of the court of appeals affirmed an order of the circuit court for Winnebago County, Karen L. Seifert, Judge, denying J.M.'s motion for post-disposition relief.1 J.M. seeks relief, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel.
¶ 2 Three questions are presented to this court:
*33¶ 3 First, does J.M. have a statutory right to effective assistance of counsel at a Chapter 51 commitment-extension proceeding, and if so, what standard should apply in evaluating a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel?
¶ 4…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Grado v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
- Langlade County v. D. J. W.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
- In re BraddySupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
- State v. DeAnthony K. MuldrowWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Kordell L. GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.