Legal Opinion

Winnebago Cnty. v. J.M. (In Re Mental Commitment of J.M.)

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2018No. 2016AP000619PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

*32¶ 1 This review involves a Chapter 51 commitment-extension proceeding. The unpublished decision of the court of appeals affirmed an order of the circuit court for Winnebago County, Karen L. Seifert, Judge, denying J.M.'s motion for post-disposition relief.1 J.M. seeks relief, claiming ineffective assistance of counsel.

¶ 2 Three questions are presented to this court:

*33¶ 3 First, does J.M. have a statutory right to effective assistance of counsel at a Chapter 51 commitment-extension proceeding, and if so, what standard should apply in evaluating a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel?

¶ 4…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Holbrook v. FlynnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Grado v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  2. Langlade County v. D. J. W.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  3. In re BraddySupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  4. State v. DeAnthony K. MuldrowWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. Kordell L. GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API