Legal Opinion
Village of Sleepy Hollow v. Pulte Home Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided January 27, 2003No. 2—02—0410PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman
Plaintiff, Village of Sleepy Hollow (Sleepy Hollow), appeals the denial of its motion to dismiss the petition for damages of defendant, Pulte Home Corporation (Pulte). Sleepy Hollow contends that the trial court erred in concluding that the issue of Sleepy Hollow’s asserted immunity from liability is controlled by section 2 — 208 of the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (745 ILCS 10/2 — 208 (West 2000)) (Immunity Act), rather than section 2 — 201 of the Immunity Act (745 ILCS 10/2 — 201 (West 2000)).
This cause of action began when Sleepy Hollow challenged the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re Chicago Flood LitigationIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Harinek v. 161 North Clark Street Ltd. PartnershipIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Village of Bloomingdale v. CDG Enterprises, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Rochelle Disposal Service, Inc. v. Pollution Control BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- A.R. v. Chicago Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Village of Sleepy Hollow v. Pulte Home Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003