Legal Opinion

Young v. Kimber

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1908No. 5417; No. 3075 C. APublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Denver District Court. Hon. J ohm I. Mullins, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

The complaint in this action alleged that the plaintiff was the owner of certain bonds issued by The Gunnell Gold Mining and Milling Company; that upon the first day of January, 1900, there were interest coupons due thereon amounting to $1,295.00; that the International Trust Company of Denver was in possession of the bonds and coupons for plaintiff and delivered them to the defendant for collection, and that upon the 8th of January, 1900, the defendant collected for the use and benefit of the plaintiff'the sum of $1,295.00 on account of these coupons. The seventh paragraph of the complaint…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Field v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Stacy v. . GrahamNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Howard v. . FranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Quimby v. LyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Chapman v. BurtIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  2. Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
  3. Cree v. LewisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  4. Pearl Assur. Co., Limited v. School Dist. No. 1 in San Miguel County, Colo. School Dist. No. 1 in San Miguel County, Colo. v. Pearl Assur. Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  5. West Elk Land & Livestock Co. v. TelckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API