Legal Opinion
State v. Boland, Ca2007-01-016 (2-4-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 4, 2008No. Nos. CA2007-01-016, CA2007-01-017PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals a decision from the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas granting a motion to suppress in favor of defendant-appellees, Joseph and Robin Boland. We reverse the decision of the trial court.
{¶ 2} On October 25, 2005, Agent John Pryor of the Miami Township Police Department was requested to accompany caseworkers from Clermont County Children's Services to investigate a complaint of narcotics activity occurring at appellees' residence in Amelia. Appellees' live in the residence with their daughter, her boyfriend, Claude Godfrey, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. BrysonOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. MarcumOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. Byrne, Ca2007-11-268 (8-25-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. LandrumOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Cleveland v. Shaker Hts. Apts. Owner, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026
- State v. WinstonClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 2010