Legal Opinion
State v. Byrne, Ca2007-11-268 (8-25-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 25, 2008No. Nos. CA2007-11-268, CA2007-11-269PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals a decision of the Butler County Area I Court granting the motions to suppress filed by defendants-appellees, Kathleen Byrne and Kristina Sicker. For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
{¶ 2} The record of this case indicates that Oxford police contacted appellees for information about a student who died after she was struck by a train in Oxford, Ohio.
Appellees were subsequently charged with a violation of R.C. 4301.69(B), which states that no person who is an owner or occupant of any public or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. HoffnerOhio Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. DurhamOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. FridleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. FrostOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. GomezOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.