Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Murphy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne; Frazer, J. Assumpsit by George L. K. Morrow against Thomas Murphy to recover a balance due on a contract for services. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Plaintiff brought suit in assumpsit against *205defendant for services, claiming that he had- worked for defendant for a number of years under an agreement that he should receive for his services $1,'200 a year as salary, and 8 per cent, of the net profits; that the services had terminated; and that there was a balance due him of $5,000. Defendant pleaded the general issue, with notice of set-off and recoupment. The case was referred, and the referee made findings, and settled a bill of exceptions, from which it appears that, in 1889, the plaintiff entered into a contract with defendant to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hill v. BowmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Soberg v. SandersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Crawford v. CalkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Carpenter v. LennaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Edwards v. WilleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Goodin v. PittNevada Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API