Legal Opinion
Goodin v. Pitt
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1913No. 1979Published
Appeal from Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; John S. Orr, Judge, presiding. Action by W. H. Goodin against W. C. Pitt. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
NORCROSS, J.:
Plaintiff, respondent herein, brought his action against appellant to recover judgment for an alleged balance due him of $1,640.38, by virtue of the provisions of a written contract entered into between the parties, and reading as follows:
*157"This agreement made, this 17th day of June, A. D. 1907, between W. C. Pitt the party of the first part and W. H. Goodin the party of the second part. Witnesseth: That the above named parties have this day entered into agreement as follows: W. C. Pitt agrees to pay to W. H. Goodin $125 per month wages commencing from the 15th day of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Thomas v. Columbia Phonograph Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Nebraska National Bank v. PennockNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
- Beakley v. RobertMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Gaul v. . Kiel Arthe Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Conville v. ShookNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.