Grover v. Bach
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Traverse county on a promissory note. The case was tried before Watts, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of defendants. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
This is an action upon a promissory note executed by the defendants for $300, dated December 7, 1892, due October 1, 1893, and payable, with interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum, to the order of H. B. Cory. The complaint alleges the execution of the note by the defendants, and that it was, for value, trans*300ferred (not indorsed) to the plaintiff before its maturity. ' The answer, so far as here material, admitted the execution of the note, put in issue the plaintiff’s ownership thereof, and, as a fur- ■ ther defense, set up the plea of usury. TÉe trial court instructed the jury, in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Funk v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Hawkins v. SaubySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Peterson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Anderson v. LiljengrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Nelson v. BullardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Campbell v. Canadian Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Goedhard v. FolstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.