Legal Opinion

State v. Elam

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1994No. 93-194PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The question certified for our review is whether, under R.C. 2929.41(E), there exists an aggregate minimum term of incarceration for consecutive multiple sentences for offenses that have been imposed consecutively to a life sentence for aggravated murder.

R.C. 2929.41(B) allows the imposition of consecutive terms of incarceration in several situations, including “[w]hen the trial court specifies” that they are to be served consecutively. R.C. 2929.41(B)(1). R.C. 2929.41(E) limits the trial court’s discretion to impose consecutive sentences, and provides in relevant part:

“Consecutive terms of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SliderOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. State v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HanningOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. D.W.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. D.W.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. SibertOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. HanningOhio Supreme Court · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API