Legal Opinion
State v. Hanning
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 2000No. 1999-0437PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 86.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. HANNING, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Hanning,
2000-Ohio-436.] Juvenile court—Transfer of case for criminal prosecution—R.C. 2151.26(B)(4)(b) applies, when—Complicity statute, R.C. 2923.03, does not apply to the juvenile bindover criteria set forth in R.C. 2151.26. 1. The mandatory bindover provision of R.C. 2151.26(B)(4)(b) does not apply unless the child, himself or herself, had a firearm on or about the child’s person or under the child’s control while committing the act charged…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. HanningOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. SoloveOhio Supreme Court · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. Kimble, 06 Ma 190 (3-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. ElliottOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. Hall, 08ap-939 (5-14-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.