William H. Waters, Inc. v. March
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
The plaintiff, a manufacturer of hatters’ furs, for many years has been a purchaser of hareskins from which are *121clipped the fur used in the manufacture of hats. The defendants, composing the firm of Carlowitz & Co., are merchants in China hareskins, with offices in several cities of China, where such skins are produced for export. They have sold China hareskins to the plaintiff at various times since 1925 through Bingham & Co., their selling agent in the United States.
The controversy which has resulted in this litigation arises out of three contracts for the sale to the plaintiff of raw China…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Thomas v. . ScuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Chapin v. . DobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Mitchill v. LathNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Eighmie v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- De Witt v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Potsdam Central Schools v. Honeywell, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Sky Acres Aviation Services, Inc. v. Styles Aviation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Zugarek v. WalckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Cohn v. Titan Drilling Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Hong Kong Deposit and Guar. Co. Ltd. v. HibdonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.