Legal Opinion

Monks v. Hess

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1928No. File No. 6390PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORIARTY, G.

This action was brought to recover rents alleged to 'be due to- plaintiffs -under the terms of a lease. The trial court made its fin-dings and conclusions in favor of the plaintiffs and entered judgment accordingly. From such judgment and from-an order denying a new trial, the defendants appeal.

There is no -Conflict in the evidence, and: the- facts shown by the record are as follows:

On November 6, 1922, the plaintiffs were the owners of certain real property in the city of Watertown. On that date said-owners entered into a written -contract with McCarthy Bros. Theatrical Company…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Banbury v. SherinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Bradley v. SlaterNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Burdick Tire & Rubber Co. v. HeylmannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Wadsworth v. OwensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Solomon v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sinift v. SiniftSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
  2. Reeves v. LyonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  3. Schenck v. SchenckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API