Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Rogers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 18, 1923No. 7 Div. 409PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.

The property sued for is a storehouse in the city of Gadsden, one side of which had been rented to and occupied by a shoe shop, and the other side to the defendant Blum, who occupied it until February 1, 1917, when he subleased it to the defendant Solomon. Blum’s original lease ran from February 1, 1916, to February 1, 1917, and was extended to February 1, 1918.

The issues presented on the trial were: (1) Whether defendants were in possession of both halves of the storehouse at the time of suit, including the half disclaimed. (2) Whether, upon the admitted holding over by defendants after the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Irwin v. EversonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. A. G. Rhodes Furniture Co. v. WeedenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  3. Wolffe v. WolffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Robinson & Ledyard v. HoltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Doe ex dem. Brown v. HuntSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. DemarcoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Reynolds v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Bear v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Monks v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Rainwater v. PreasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API