Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Lyon

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 15, 1938No. 44249PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitohell, J.

Harry Haskell Reeves, as administrator of the estate of his father, commenced this action at law, alleging the conversion by Florene Lyon and Treacy Hart O’Conner of $9,000 par value United States government bonds belonging to the estate of A. M. Reeves. The defendants filed separate answers, in four divisions: (1) Denying generally the allegations of the petition; (2) alleging that plaintiff’s intestate during his lifetime created a trust, the subject-matter of which the United States government bonds were; (3) that the defendants were joint owners and tenants; and, lastly, as to $3,500 par…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Reed v. CopelandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
  2. Matheson v. MathesonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Arndt v. LapelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Criswell v. CriswellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. Kyle v. KyleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ConnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  2. State v. EbelsheiserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  3. Matter of Estate of CrabtreeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  5. Pierce v. HeusinkveldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API