Williams v. Long
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. F. W. Street, Percy V. Long, and C. C. Hamilton, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiff’s intestate, and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial, they appeal. The appeal from the judgment has by this court been dismissed (Williams v. Long, 130 Cal. 58 1 ), and there remains for consideration only the order denying the motion for a new trial. Plaintiff’s intestate, Henry Williams, who owned the claim, and the defendant Long, entered into an agreement for its sale and purchase, the contract providing, among other things, for a payment, though not the final one, at a given time, of ten thousand dollars. Williams executed a deed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Grey v. TubbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Settle v. WintersIdaho Supreme Court · 1886
- Williams v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Rhorer v. BilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Hannan v. McNickleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Van Horn v. Pacific Refining & Roofing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Lowe v. San Francisco & Northwestern Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Crescent Feather Co. v. United Upholsterers' Union, Local No. 28California Supreme Court · 1908
- Bennie v. Becker-Franz Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1913
- Hanschka v. VodopichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.