Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Williams

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 10, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

A question of commissions requires determination. Deceased put one-half of his estate in trust for the life of his wife with remainder to “be added to the balance of my estate and be handled in the manner provided therein.” This “ balance ” he divided into three equal parts. Two parts he bequeathed outright. The third he gave in trust for the life benefit of a daughter. A single trustee has been acting for both wife and daughter. The trust for the wife has now ended. One-third of its corpus is about to be paid into the fund from which the daughter derives income. The trustee has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of WildNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Leask v. BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of FarollNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
  2. In re the Estate of ReckfordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944
  3. Barsotti v. BertolinoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  4. In re the Estate of LynchNew York Surrogate's Court · 1985
  5. In re the Estate of BarrettNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API