In re the Estate of Reckford
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
By a prior decision in this accounting proceeding, certain provisions of the will were construed. (Matter of Reckford, N. Y. L. J. December 15, 1943, p. 1773.) The questions of the amount of commissions to which the trustees are entitled were left open for subsequent determination. Disposition is now made. An interpretation of the terms of new section 285-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act is required. Four general questions are presented:(1) Whether a trustee is entitled to commissions for receiving the funds within the trusts which have not terminated?(2) Whether under the terms of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of BarkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- In Re the Accounting of BusheNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- In Re the Accounting of WildNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Leask v. BeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- In re the Estate of HurlbutNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Estate of FarollNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
- In re the Estate of EdwardsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944
- In re the Estate of McGrathNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
- In re the Accounting of Lincoln Rochester Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1948
- In re the Accounting of MillerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.