Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lee v. McNeil

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 27, 1992No. CR 91-153Published

1DissentSteele Hays, Justice

The obvious and increasing need for the efficient operation of the judicial system and the wise use of judicial resources mitigate in favor of inventive measures like the one before us. Such devices should be sustained except where invalidity is clear. I respectfully suggest the majority opinion fails to demonstrate that invalidity.

To begin with, petitioner’s remedy, if he is dissatisfied with the outcome of his trial, is by appeal rather than by mandamus, and I would not undermine our precedents, and there are many, that “mandamus will not be granted when there is a remedy by appeal.” Burks…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  2. State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855
  3. Ricarte v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Mears v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API