Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 26, 1977No. 77-62PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellant entered into an appearance bond agreement for Willie Earl Knighten’s appearance in municipal court where he was a defendant on a felony charge. He appeared there and after a hearing was certified to the circuit court where an information was filed on the charge. A new bond was not made. There the defendant failed to appear on plea and arraignment date, although notified and ordered to do so. The circuit court then ordered appellant, as surety, to show cause why the bond should not be forfeited. Subsequently, appellant was ordered to pay the bond based upon the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. State v. RoyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  3. In re Constitutionality of Statute Empowering Supreme Court to Promulgate Rules Regulating Pleading, Practice, & Procedure in Judicial ProceedingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Foster-Wyman Lumber Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State Ex Rel. Blood v. Gibson Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ricarte v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Casement v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. State v. VallesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. LesterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API