Legal Opinion

Vandervort v. Keen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 22, 1938No. 28532PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

This is an original proceeding by Dennis Vandervort and others for writ of prohibition against AV. P. Keen, district judge of Custer county, to arrest proceedings in an injunction suit brought in that court by the State Board of Barber Examiners against petitioners pursuant to article 2. chapter 24, S. L. 1937, known as the Barber Law.

The aforesaid statute is attacked as unconstitutional upon the same grounds as urged in the case of Herrin v. Arnold, 183 Okla. 392, 82 P.2d 977. The facts and circumstances here are in every respect analogous to those arising and presented in that case, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Herrin v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bennett v. District Court of Tulsa Co.Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Arnold v. Board of Barber ExaminersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Ex Parte StrauchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. Ex Parte HerrinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Sparks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API