Legal Opinion

Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. Harter

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 15, 1993No. 92 Civ. 7988 (VLB)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

VINCENT L. BRODERICK, District Judge.

I

This case involves a contract action brought by plaintiff Tetra Technologies, Inc., a Texas engineering firm (the “Texas company”), against the Village of Florida, New York (the “Village”). 1 It presents the ques tion of whether New York professional licensing laws do — or consistently with the Constitution could — require that both contractors and those actually supervising the work be licensed by the State. I answer this question in the negative.

Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. 2 Defendants have…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Burch v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
  2. Mazuma Holding Corp. v. BethkeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  3. Eric M. Berman, P.C. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  4. Schueler v. Roman Asphalt Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  5. Joseph v. David M. Schwarz/Architectural Services, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API