In Re the Estate of Jepson
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss appeals from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County setting aside a homestead and dismissing a contest to the application to set aside such homestead. James C. Rives, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Dissent
LORIGAN, J., Dissenting.
I dissent.
As subdivisions 2 and 4 of section 1386 of the Civil Code now stand they provide—subdivision 2—that “If the decedent leaves no issue, the estate goes one-half to the surviving husband or wife, and the other half to the decedent’s father and mother in equal shares, and if either is dead the whole of said half goes to the other. If there is no father or mother, then one-half goes in equal shares to the brothers and sisters of decedent and to the children or grandchildren of any deceased brother or sister by right of representation.” I have italicized that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Estate of IngramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In Re Estate of NigroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- In re Estate of CarmodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- In Re Estate of NigroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- In Re Estate of ClaiborneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.