Legal Opinion

Alaska Workmen's Compensation Board v. Marsh

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1976No. 2449PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

The question presented in this appeal is whether the Alaska Workmen’s Compensation Board correctly refused to entertain an applicant’s claim for compensation. In this instance the board refused to act because a civil action, based upon the same occurrence as the claim for workmen’s compensation, was pending in the superior court. The appellants urge that the board can properly withhold action, and thus they seek reversal of the superior court’s order remanding the case to the board for determination of appellee’s workmen’s compensation claim. Because of the amount of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Busick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Brindley v. MearaIndiana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Jefferson v. AsplundAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Laborers & Hod Carriers Union, Local No. 341 v. GroothuisAlaska Supreme Court · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ehredt v. DeHavilland Aircraft Co. of CanadaAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Marsh v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Himschoot v. ShanleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Matter of Estate of KatchatagAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Leona Seal, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Nicholson J. Tinker v. Mark C. Welty d/b/a North Country ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API