Legal Opinion

Sargent v. Canterbury Mutual Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 4, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

“The fact of a waiver, like other facts, must be found from some evidence.” Maynard v. Insurance Co., 76 N. H. 275, 277. Silence, when there is no duty to speak, is no evidence of a waiver. Kilgore v. Association, 78 N. H. 498, 500. In the absence of misrepresentation the insured is presumed to know the provisions, terms and conditions of his policy. Lauze v. Insurance Co., 74 N. H. 334, 338, and cases cited.

Silence being a right unless the circumstances are such that it amounts to misrepresentation, the defendant’s exercise of the right was no relinquishment of the right of forfeiture. There…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lauze v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
  2. Daley v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  3. Barrette v. Casualty Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
  4. Kilgore v. Loyal Protective Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  5. Maynard v. United States Health & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shurtleff v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  2. Boston & Maine Railroad v. Northern RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API