Legal Opinion

Daley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 3, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The policy by its terms would have-become forfeited for non-payment of premiums four weeks after June 28, 1920, but for the extension of the grace period to thirteen weeks, which kept it in force until September 27. It is conceded that the tender of October 9 could not operate to reinstate the policy under the revival clause since the insured’s condition at that time precluded compliance with the requirement of proof of good health. The tender was therefore too late Unless there was a waiver of the time limit, and the exception relative to a directed verdict presents the question whether…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. St. Laurent v. Manchester Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
  2. Bourassa v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909
  3. State v. WrenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
  4. Davis v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
  5. State v. SmallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bennett v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Schwartz v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  3. Davis v. Universal Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. McCrillis v. American Heel Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  5. Buxton v. LanganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API