Legal Opinion
Shurtleff v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided January 31, 1973No. 6375PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
By this action the plaintiff seeks to recover a balance alleged to be due under a policy of fire insurance issued by the defendant in the amount of $15,000 on April 9, 1967, for a term of three years, insuring premises in Errol. The case was reserved and transferred to this court upon an agreed statement of facts, without ruling, by Keller, C.J.
The insured single-family dwelling was totally destroyed by fire on February 23, 1969. Previously, on November 14, 1968, the plaintiff had insured the premises by an additional policy, issued by St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. for a term of one year…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCaffery v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- American Employers Insurance v. SterlingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1958
- Daeris, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
- Heath v. Springfield Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1878
- Sargent v. Canterbury Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
3Cited by4 opinions
- California Casualty Insurance v. Northland InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. LaChanceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Township of Washington v. Warren County Tax AdministratorNew Jersey Tax Court · 2000
- Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Lee Raceway, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973