Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Balling

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 10, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Trespass on the Case.—Negligence in the application of X-Ray process. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Arthur H. Chetlain, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1899.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellants, Otto L. Schmidt and Wolfram C. Fuchs, were sued, jointly with Frederick M. Schmidt, and the Roentgen' X-Ray Laboratory, a corporation, in an action on the case. by the appellee to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been inflicted upon him by exposing him, negligently, to an application of the so-called X-Ray process. ifo case being made against Frederick M. Schmidt and the laboratory, the suit as to them was dismissed by the plaintiff.

A judgment of $7,000 against the remaining defendants, the appellants,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schrœder v. Merchants & Mechanics' InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. JenkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Herman Berghoff Brewing Co. v. PrzbylskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  4. Fame Insurance v. MannAppellate Court of Illinois · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Van Meter v. GurneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  2. McHale v. McQuiggAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  3. Sharp v. GallagherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Massman v. DuffyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946
  5. Coen v. Denver Township Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API