Legal Opinion
Lazaros v. City of West Haven
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 1, 1997No. AC 14376PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered after a jury verdict in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly (1) granted five of the defendants’ motions to strike and (2) denied their motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. In 1966, the West Haven city council (city) approved a redevelopment plan previously adopted by the defendant West Haven redevelopment agency. The redevelopment plan called for the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Ginsberg v. FusaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Fox v. Colony T.V. & Appliance, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Southeastern Connecticut Regional Resources Recovery Authority v. American Ref-Fuel Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lazaros v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997