Legal Opinion

Cano-Diaz v. City of Leeds

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided August 1, 2012No. Case No. 2:11-CV-3448-VEHPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, District Judge.

Before the court is the Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (the “Motion”) (doc. 33), filed on May 29, 2012, by Defendants City of Alabaster, Alabama, City of Irondale, Alabama, and City of Leeds, Alabama.1 The Motion has been fully briefed by the parties (see docs. 38, 42). Additionally, the court heard oral argument on the Motion on July 10, 2012. Therefore, the Motion is under submission and ripe for the court’s decision.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Procedural History

Originally, there were eleven (11) individual…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baker v. BrockmeyerDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2021
  2. Kuykendall v. MarshallDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
  3. Patterson v. McLean County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2021
  4. Pettway v. MarshallDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
  5. Russell v. Cullman CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API