Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Budget Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1979No. Nos. 78-1349 and 78-1350PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

This court has recently held, in Painesville v. Lake County Budget Comm. (1978), 56 Ohio St. 2d 282, 284. that:

*45“The right to appeal an allocation of a local government fund to the Board of Tax Appeals is created by statute. (R. C. 5747.55.) Therefore, if appellant has failed to •comply with the appropriate statutory requirements, the board lacks subject-matter jurisdiction to hear the appeal. ‘

* # ‘ # J J

R. C. 5747.55(C)(3) specifically requires as a prerequisite to the invocation of jurisdiction upon the Board of Tax Appeals the filing of a statement by the appellant attached to the notice…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Painesville v. Lake County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Elyria v. Lorain County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. City of Cincinnati v. Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Austintown Township v. Mahoning County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Union Township v. Butler County Budget CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Hills Dales v. Dept. of Edn., 06ap-1249 (9-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API