Hartman v. Buerger
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The judgment appealed from granted the defendants-respondents’ motion for summary judgment in an action for defamation brought by plaintiff-appellant, Claire A. Hartman. The summary judgment was based on defendants’ claim that an “absolute privilege” applies when a police officer gives requested character information to a licensing authority regarding an application for a fermented-malt beverage license.
On July 8, 1969, Mr. Hartman filed an application for a license to dispense fermented-malt beverages with the clerk of the town of Delton in Sauk county, pursuant to sec. 66.054, Stats. 1969.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ranous v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Bergman v. HupyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Lininger v. KnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- DiMiceli v. KliegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Werner v. AscherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Converters Equipment Corp. v. Condes Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Gersh v. AmbroseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- First National Bank of Columbus v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Vultaggio v. YaskoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Rady v. LutzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.