Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Buerger

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1976No. 179 (1974)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The judgment appealed from granted the defendants-respondents’ motion for summary judgment in an action for defamation brought by plaintiff-appellant, Claire A. Hartman. The summary judgment was based on defendants’ claim that an “absolute privilege” applies when a police officer gives requested character information to a licensing authority regarding an application for a fermented-malt beverage license.

On July 8, 1969, Mr. Hartman filed an application for a license to dispense fermented-malt beverages with the clerk of the town of Delton in Sauk county, pursuant to sec. 66.054, Stats. 1969.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ranous v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Bergman v. HupyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Lininger v. KnightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  4. DiMiceli v. KliegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Werner v. AscherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Converters Equipment Corp. v. Condes Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Gersh v. AmbroseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. First National Bank of Columbus v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Vultaggio v. YaskoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Rady v. LutzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API