Converters Equipment Corp. v. Condes Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
As to the trial court’s overruling of the defendant’s demurrer, several issues are raised on appeal. Each such issue will be put in question form and responded to.
ARE THE TWO LETTERS CAPABLE OF A DEFAMATORY MEANING?
In an action for libel, on demurrer, if both malice and falsity are alleged, both malice and falsity must be considered facts which are presumed to be true for the purposes of the demurrer. Here the plaintiffs have alleged both malice and falsity, and at the demurrer stage both malice and falsity must be accepted as facts. It follows that the demurrer was properly overruled unless,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Frinzi v. HansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Kennedy v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Arthur Theiss v. Gordon H. SchererCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Martin v. Outboard Marine Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Ranous v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Tammy Howell, a Minor, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Charles Goerdt v. Tribune Entertainment Company and Abc Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Segall v. HurwitzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Denny v. MertzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Zinda v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Greggar S. Isaksen D/B/A Applewood Stove Works v. Vermont Castings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.