Legal Opinion

Cousin v. Taylor

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1925PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEand, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against Walter K. Taylor, S. S. Harrelson and fourteen other defendants to recover for services performed at a rate hearing before the Oregon Public Service Commission. His right of recovery is based upon an alleged employment by Taylor, who, he alleges, was acting for himself individually and as agent of the other defendants. In support of his allegation he offered testimony tending to show that at a hearing before said commission to establish a schedule of rates to be charged by the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company for telephone service an order was made…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lewis v. TiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  2. Buchtel v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Lawler v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
  4. Blakely v. BenneckeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  5. Fredendall v. TaylorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Karl Rove & Company v. Richard Thornburgh, Richard Thornburgh, Cross-Appellee, and Raymond P. Dimuzio, Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. I. W. Phillips & Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Shortlidge v. GutoskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. William Benz v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo, S.A., M. D. MacRae v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo, S.A., Jeff Morrison v. Compania Naviera Hidalgo, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Philadelphia Life Insurance Co., and Rask & Associates, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. Rask & Associates, Third-Party v. John L. Griffith, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API