Legal Opinion
Bada Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1970No. Nos. 23436, 23433PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Appellant is the owner of two patents relating to a system of balancing automobile wheels, and of the registered trademarks “Micro” and “Micro-Precision,” applicable to wheel weights and balancers used in the patented system. This action is for infringement of both patents and trademarks, and for unfair competition. The District Court found that the patents were invalid for obviousness, 35 U.S.C. § 103, but that if valid they had been infringed. It held the trademarks valid and infringed, and awarded damages. Defendants’ counterclaim, alleging patent and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Zobmondo Entertainment, LLC v. Falls Media, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Self-Realization Fellowship Church v. Ananda Church of Self-RealizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Anti-Monopoly, Inc., and Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. General Mills Fun Group, Inc., and Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Alderman v. Iditarod Properties, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.