Legal Opinion
Berexa v. Target Corp.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 2, 2024No. 2:24-cv-01154Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 LINDA BEREXA, No. 2:24-cv-01154-JAM-DMC 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 15 TARGET CORPORATION, and DOES 1 to 25, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Before the Court is Target Corporation’s (hereinafter, 19 “Defendant”) motion to dismiss four of the five causes of action 20 in Linda Berexa’s (hereinafter, “Plaintiff”) First Amended 21 Complaint (“FAC”). See Mot., ECF No. 16; FAC, ECF No. 15. 22 Plaintiff opposed. See Opp’n, ECF No. 18. Defendant replied. 23 See Reply, ECF No. 19. For the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.) Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- State of Missouri v. Kamala HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.